Every processed story in chronological order, with the newest coverage first. Filter by tag, source, or score to drill in.
Despite code access giving LLM agents a measurable edge on time series tasks, a 22–34% error rate on benchmark questions exposes a concrete reliability gap that limits their use in high-stakes automated decision-making domains like finance and healthcare.
SING reduces full-corpus tool-schema exposure by 99.8% while simultaneously improving retrieval recall and task success, directly addressing the context-cost and closed-world limitations that arise as agentic tool ecosystems scale to thousands of APIs.
AEGIS removes the router operator as a trusted party in the agent-LLM communication path, blocking all four identified attack classes that existing client-side defenses cannot prevent.
The paper reframes persistent LLM agent reliability problems as architectural rather than model-quality issues, proposing a concrete structural alternative that bounds context growth and removes control-flow hallucination by design.
Classical resilient consensus filters demonstrably improve LLM agent agreement, showing that formal distributed-systems theory can directly inform the safety design of multi-agent AI systems.
RSA demonstrates that dynamic, context-targeted auditing catches malicious agent skills that static detectors miss and remain robust under self-evolving adversarial attacks where static methods collapse.
SkillAudit removes the dependency on privileged external feedback signals that existing skill-evolution methods require, enabling agent skill improvement in real-world deployments where only a task description and workspace data are available.
Compilation-based metrics, the current standard for judging autoformalization agents, are shown to substantially overstate quality by missing semantic errors that a reproducible three-dimensional audit framework can detect.
RefGRPO demonstrates that agent self-assessment can be substantially improved without any external annotation or reward model, enabling agents to act as their own verifiers grounded in environment feedback.
HarnessX demonstrates that evolving the runtime scaffolding around a model — rather than scaling the model itself — can deliver substantial benchmark gains, offering a complementary path to agent improvement that does not require larger or more expensive models.